In der Diskussion um die Glöobale Erwärmung wird viel um "tipping points" hergemacht, Kipppunkte, bei deren Erreichung die Sache unwiderruflich ins Abrutschen gerät.
Manchmal hat man den Eindruck, daß ein solcher Zeitpunkt tatsächlich erreicht sei.

Zuerst meldet der Economist erhebliche Zweifel am gängigen Klimakatastrophennarrativ an. Und jetzt Forbes:
Zwar ist das als Op/Ed. als als namentlich gezeichneter Leitartikel, ausgeschildert & spiegelt somit nicht die Meinung der Redaktion", aber dafür holt der Autor, Peter Ferrara vom Heartland Institute, auch mächtig aus.

The Disgraceful Episode Of Lysenkoism Brings Us Global Warming Theory

Zitat Forbes, 28. April 2013
_____________
This same practice of Lysenkoism has long been under way in western science in regard to the politically correct theory of man caused, catastrophic, global warming. That theory serves the political fashions of the day in promoting vastly increased government powers and control over the private economy. Advocates of the theory are lionized in the dominant Democrat party controlled media in the U.S., and in leftist controlled media in other countries. Critics of the theory are denounced as “deniers,” and even still bourgeois fascists, with their motives impugned.

Those who promote the theory are favored with billions from government grants and neo-Marxist environmentalist largesse, and official recognition and award. Faked and tampered data and evidence has arisen in favor of the politically correct theory. Is not man-caused, catastrophic global warming now the only theory allowed to be taught in schools in the West?
...

The editors of the once respected journals of Science and Nature have abandoned science for Lysenkoism on this issue as well. They have become as political as the editorial pages of the New York Times. They claim their published papers are peer reviewed, but those reviews are conducted on the friends and family plan when it comes to the subject of anthropogenic catastrophic global warming. There can be no peer review at all when authors refuse to release their data and computer codes for public inspection and attempted reconstruction of reported results by other scientists. They have been forced to backtrack on recent publications relying on novel, dubious, statistical methodologies not in accordance with established methodologies of complex statistical analysis.
...
Then there is the man caused, global warming, fingerprint that the U.N.’s models all showed would result in a hot spot of particularly large temperature increases in the upper troposphere above the tropics. But the incorruptible, satellite monitored, atmospheric temperature record shows no hot spot. That is further confirmed by modern weather balloons measuring atmospheric temperatures above the tropics. No hotspot. No fingerprint. No catastrophic, man caused global warming. QED.
_____________

In der Tonart ist in den MSM bislang nicht musiziert worden.
(& als Zugabe noch: "Lysenkoism was “politically correct” (a term invented by Lenin)...")

P.S. ditto in den Deutschen Wirtschafts-Nachrichten, 17.04.13:
Forscher haben sich blamiert: Der Klimawandel findet nicht statt